Submissions

Author Guidelines

General Rules: Authors of original submissions must present an accurate account of the research performed, as well as an objective analysis of its significance. Underlying data must be accurately presented in the text. A document should contain enough detail and references to allow others to replicate the research. Fraudulent or intentionally inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Originality and plagiarism: Authors must ensure that their works are completely original and, if the authors used the research, words or expressions of other authors, these must have been properly cited and referenced. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical and unacceptable publishing behavior.

Multiple, redundant, or competing publications: An author should generally not publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal that requires originality. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously, or publishing the same research in different journals, constitutes unethical and unacceptable publishing behavior.

Identification of bibliographic sources: Proper acknowledgment of third-party research should always be done. Authors must cite the publications that influenced the determination of the nature of the reported work. Information obtained privately, such as through informal conversations, correspondence or discussions with third parties, must not be used or reported without explicit, written permission from the source. Information obtained in the course of confidential activities, such as submissions for evaluation or funding projects, must not be used without the explicit written authorization of the author of the work involved in these activities.

Authorship: Authorship must be attributed to those who contributed significantly to the conception, design, execution or interpretation of the reported study. All those who made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Persons who participated in substantive aspects of the research project should also be recognized or listed as contributors or collaborators. The lead author must ensure that only suitable co-authors are included in the article, and that all co-authors have read and approved the final version of the document and agreed to its submission to Revista Bindi.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: All authors must disclose in their manuscripts any financial or other conflict of interest that could lead to influencing results or interpretations in their submissions. All sources of financial support for the project must be disclosed.

Peer review: Authors must be available to cooperate, responding to requests from the Editorial Team on the steps of the editorial process, responding point by point and in a timely manner to comments/suggestions/corrections of peer review, returning the material to the Journal Bindi within the established time frame. In addition, authors must respond promptly to clarifications and approval of language and layout revision steps, copyright releases, etc.

Fundamental Errors in Published Articles: When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his own published article, it is the author's obligation to immediately notify Bindi Journal editors or the institution and cooperate with the editors to retract or correct the article.

DUTIES OF THE PUBLISHING ENTITY

Management of publication unethical behavior: In cases of alleged or proven scientific misconduct, fraudulent publication or plagiarism, the publishing institution, i.e. Instituto Norberto Bobbio, in close collaboration with the Editorial Team, will take all appropriate measures to clarify the situation. This includes the immediate publication of an errata, clarification or, in the most serious case, retraction of the affected work. The publishing institution, together with the Editorial Team, will take reasonable steps to identify and prevent the publication of material with research misconduct and, in no event, will encourage such conduct or knowingly allow such conduct to occur.

Access to the journal's content: Bind Magazine offers immediate and free access to its content, following the principle that the free availability of scientific knowledge provides greater democratization of knowledge. Users may read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without seeking prior permission from the publisher or author, as long as they respect the Creative Commons Attribution license 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) used by the journal. Authors may republish materials elsewhere, provided the Editorial Team is informed, and only from the date

SUBMISSION RULES

Articles, reviews and interviews submitted to Revista Bindi (RB) must be unpublished and cannot be under evaluation in another journal.

Authors can submit manuscripts at any time, without the need to pay any kind of submission or editing fees for the articles. The opinions expressed and the integrity of the content of the articles are the absolute responsibility of their authors.

Texts that are published on the internet are not considered unpublished (unless deposited on certified preprint and postprint servers); already published abroad (albeit in another language); published in other journals, books or collections.
The following will be considered unpublished: works previously published in the annals of scientific events, provided they present effective improvements due to debates and subsequent studies (identify such changes to the editorial team in the comments of the submission); theses and dissertations published in online reference systems of Universities by regimental obligation.

The texts must be written in Portuguese, English, Spanish, Italian and German.

FORMAT FOR ARTICLE SUBMISSION

The authors must send the cover page of the article containing the following information:

- Article title, subtitle, if any;

- Title in English;

- Name of the author; qualification; ORCID; Lattes Curriculum Link; email

- Summary; keywords (English/Portuguese)

- Keywords: 4 to 6 keywords separated by semicolons and ending with a period. They must be spelled with initials in lowercase, with the exception of proper nouns and scientific names.

- Context (optional): Contextualize the research problem/object.

- Objective: Indicate the objective of the work, that is, what the authors intend to demonstrate or describe.

- Method: Indicate the scientific method used in conducting the study.

- Conclusions: Briefly indicate the main conclusions of the work.

- Identification of the author(s): full name, degree, institution to which he/she is connected, link to the Lattes curriculum, ORCID, mailing address, telephone and e-mail.

NOTE: all authorship identification must be included only on the cover page, all other fields of the text must be without any data that allows the identification of the authors.

Authorship: All persons who contributed to the research must be indicated. Each author must have participated sufficiently in the work to be able to publicly assume responsibility for its content. Your participation must include: a) the conception or design or analysis and interpretation of data, or both; b) writing of the manuscript or its revision, when it includes important intellectual criticism of its content; c) final approval of the version to be published. Simply participating in data collection does not justify authorship.

Co-authorship: When dealing with the publication of results obtained through collective research, it is necessary to ensure the direct and effective intellectual contribution and the consent of all collaborators. The assignment of financial and infrastructure resources is not an indication of co-authorship of the version to be published. Simply participating in data collection does not justify authorship.

- Information on funding or benefits received, as well as any conflicts of interest and acknowledgments.

- Text editor: Microsoft Word.

- A4 paper format.

- Number of pages: minimum of 10 and maximum of 40;

- Margins: 3cm top and left, 2cm bottom and right.

- References: Only works actually cited in the text should be cited. References must be formatted in accordance with ABNT 6023/2018 and aligned to the left, single spacing, font Times New Roman, size 12. There must be a single space between each reference. References must be ordered alphabetically. As of the amendment of NBR 6023 in 2018, < > is no longer used for internet links. A dash should not be used to indicate works by the same author.

BOOK - SURNAME, Name. Title: subtitle. Location: publisher, date.

BOOK CHAPTER - SURNAME, Name of the author of the chapter. Chapter title. In: LAST NAME, Name of the author of the book. Book's title. Location: publisher, date.

MAGAZINE ARTICLE - LAST NAME, Name. Article title. Journal name, location, v. X, n. Y, p. W-Z, date.

LEGISLATION - JURISDICTION. Law/Decree/Amendment/Provisional Measure. Menu. Place: institution responsible for publication, date.

All materials taken from the internet must have the links activated, that is, they must be ready to be clicked and taken directly to the location where the document is located.

explanatory notes

The explanatory notes must be reduced to the minimum necessary and presented at the foot of the pages.

Tables, charts and formulas

Tables and charts should be in text format and not as a figure; Files containing formulas must be accompanied by demonstrations at the end of the article so that reviewers can better analyze the results presented;

PLAGIARISM DETECTION

Revista Bindi (RB) uses the anti-plagiarism software Plágius.

AVERAGE DEADLINES FOR EVALUATION AND PUBLICATION OF ARTICLES

Authors wishing to submit articles to Revista Bindi (RB) should be aware that:

The average term for carrying out the desk review of the article by the Editorial Team is 30 days;
The average period of evaluation of articles by reviewers (double blind peer review) is 120 days;
The average period for publication of the article is 30 days, after its approval.

Only when the above deadlines have been exceeded will we respond to query emails about the progress of the evaluation.

RESEARCH ETHICS COMMITTEE

Articles involving research with human beings or animals must comply with the ethical standards required by the National Research Ethics Committee/National Health Council/Ministry of Health (CONEP/CNS/MS). Research involving human beings must comply with the norms of Resolution 466/2012 and Resolution 510/2016 of the National Health Council - CNS, or equivalent body in the country of origin of the research.

PROCESS OF ANALYSIS OF VIOLATIONS TO SCIENTIFIC INTEGRITY GUIDELINES

BIND Journal has as its main objective the production of consistent scientific knowledge, based on an editorial process of control, evaluation and revision of works guided by parameters of scientificity and integrity in accordance with national and international bodies and institutions related to scientific publishing.

In this sense, the guidelines of the following bodies are used as guides in the editorial process:

Brazilian Association of Scientific Editors
PKP Guides for Editors and Reviewers
WAME
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and its guide to good editorial practices
FAPESP Code of Good Scientific Practices
Basic CNPq guidelines for integrity in scientific activity
Elsevier publishing Ethics Resource Kit (PERK) for editors
Guide to good practices for strengthening ethics in scientific publication SCIELO
a) RECEIPT OF THE COMPLAINT

Any person may, at any time, send complaints of acts that violate the scientific integrity guidelines established to the email willians@inb.org.br

Complaints and suspicions of acts that violate scientific integrity guidelines will be received by the editorial team of Revista Bind, which will investigate the facts described.

b) CONTRADICTORY AND COMPLETE DEFENSE

If it is verified that the facts described in the complaint are implausible, or that it is not an act that violates scientific integrity guidelines, the complaint will be filed.

Otherwise, verifying the veracity of the facts described in the complaint and if it is an act that violates the guidelines of scientific integrity, the author(s) will be notified so that, within 20 ( twenty) days, provide the necessary information and formulate your defense.

If it is verified that the period is short to provide the necessary information, the author(s) may request its extension via e-mail, informing the time necessary to formulate the defense.

c) JUDGMENT

Once the defense of the author(s) has been received, the Editor-in-Chief will judge the complaint of violation of scientific integrity guidelines within 30 (thirty) days.

In all cases, the decision will be sent by email to the author(s).

In case of disagreement with the decision taken by the Editor-in-Chief, the author(s) may request, via e-mail, the re-examination of the decision, in a reasoned manner.

d) PUNISHMENTS

Once a violation of scientific integrity guidelines is verified, the Editor-in-Chief may apply the following sanctions to the author(s), individually or cumulatively:

Communication in an instructive tone on the issue;
Warning about conduct;
Publication of news or editorial on the issue;
Formal communication of the fact to the institution of origin or to a development agency;
Suspension or deletion of reviewer or editor;
Formal retraction of the published article (see Scielo Retraction Guide);
Prohibition of new submissions for a certain period;
Formal communication of the case to the competent authorities for the investigation

INCLUSION AND DIVERSITY POLICY

Revista Bindi (RB) encourages the use of inclusive language in the writing of scientific articles, in order to encourage inclusion and diversity. It is believed that language and science are socialization agents that can reproduce or try to contribute to overcoming structural inequalities in society.

Published content must not state or allude that one person is superior to another because of age, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, culture, religion, sexual orientation, disability or health condition. It is even an imposition of the Brazilian Constitution of 1988 in its republican and equality principles.
Care must be taken to avoid the reproduction of stereotypes and partial views of reality, influenced by structural inequalities in society. Avoid terms with negative connotations.
The adoption of gender-inclusive terminology is suggested, preferring the use of neutral terms (e.g. the court, instead of the judge; the technical defense, instead of the lawyer; the accused person, instead of the accused) or of both grammatical genders (ex. the lawyer; the lawyer and the lawyer).
a) The use of both grammatical genders must be weighed against the objectivity and intelligibility of the text, since the excessive use of such an option may eventually impair its accuracy.
b) It is also possible to suppress the grammatical gender, when identification is unnecessary (eg experts say, instead of “the” experts say); or use collective terms (eg, faculty rather than faculty; scientific community rather than scientists).
Avoid qualifying subjects, except when strictly necessary (eg renowned teacher, respected indoctrinator, etc.). The qualification of subjects by age, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, culture, religion, sexual orientation, disability or health condition should be avoided, unless this qualification is indispensable for the understanding and development of the research.
Standardize the reference style to authors and authors. If you choose a name and a last name, adopt them equally in all cases.

It is recommended to consult the Inclusive Language Manual of the Brazilian Senate; FRANCO, Paki Venegas; CERVERA, Julia Perez. Manual for the non-sexist use of language and the LGBTI+ Communication Manual.

In English, see: Elsevier Guidelines and UN Handbook.

In Spanish, see: UN Manual and Guidelines of the Universidad de Valencia.

In empirical research, attention is recommended to the guidelines of the 'Sex and Gender Equity in Research - SAGER - guidelines'.